Surrogacy News

  • ALL
  • Surrogacy techniques
  • Company News
  • Surrogacy Industry News
    • Kyrgyzstan IVF Guide for Singles

    Kyrgyzstan IVF Guide for Singles

    2025-06-18

    Introduction: Freedom of Fertility Meets the Pearl of Central Asia When Sophia Martinez, a 32-year-old German engineer, was told at a Berlin clinic that “single women are forbidden to use IVF,” she thought her fertility dreams were over – until she discovered that Article 57 of Kyrgyzstan’s Law on the Protection of Citizens’ Health reads: “Any citizen may not use IVF for any reason. 57: “Any citizen, regardless of marital status, has the right to assisted reproduction.” 58 This small Central Asian country is becoming a “birth haven” for singles around the world, with inclusive laws, costs that are one-third those in Europe and the U.S., and a 55 percent live birth rate for women under 35. I. legal inclusiveness: a birth revolution for singles (i) Groundbreaking legislative guarantees Kyrgyzstan is one of the few countries in the world with a constitutionally guaranteed right to procreate out of wedlock: Single women: can legally use self-egg/test tube + IVF without needing to provide proof of marriage  Single men: allowed to register as legal father directly on birth certificate through combined IVF + assisted conception program  LGBTQ+ community: some clinics accept relationship declarations and support registration of joint parenthood  Case study: Emma Clark (37), a London designer, successfully gave birth to mixed-race twins through the use of in vitro fertilization (IVF) at the RHAT Reproductive Center in Bishkek. Case: London designer Emma Clark (37) used IVF at RHAT Reproductive Center in Bishkek to give birth to mixed-race twins, showing only her passport and medical documents (ii) Cross-border legal framework Birth certificates: single mothers can have their information registered directly as their own, eliminating the need for adoption procedures2  International accreditation: JCI-accredited clinics (e.g., UFG hospitals) issue bilingual English-Russian birth certificates, with a 92% acceptance rate in the European Union  Contractual guarantees: assisted…

    Endometrial tolerance is the invisible key to IVF failure

    Endometrial tolerance is the invisible key to IVF failure

    2025-06-17

    Introduction: The Overlooked “Soil Crisis” When Sophia Martinez (37 years old, 3 failed transplants) looked at the AA-grade embryos in the petri dish, she never suspected that the problem was “soil” – until Dr. James Wilson, a fertility doctor, showed her that the endometrial tolerance of her uterus had changed. Her endometrial tolerance test: “Your implantation window was shifted by 32 hours, like letting a seed germinate on concrete”. The harsh reality: a 2025 Scientific Reports study confirmed that 75% of high-quality embryo transfers fail due to endometrial tolerance abnormalities, not the quality of the embryos themselves. Even more alarmingly, uterine aging increases implantation failure rates by 4.2% per year in women ≥40 years of age, even with young donor eggs. I. Endometrial tolerance: the “golden gatekeeper” of embryo implantation (i) Redefining the “implantation window” The lining of the uterus is not always ready to accept the embryo, but is only open for about 48 hours, known as the window of implantation (WOI). At this moment, key changes occur in the endometrium: Cytotrophoblast development: finger-like projections form on the surface, anchoring the embryo  Immune cell reorganization: down-regulation of NK cell activity, building immune tolerance  Vascular network proliferation: 300% increase in blood perfusion, delivering oxygen and nutrients  Clinical Alert: Shifting of the window of implantation in 30% of women (advancement/postponement/shortening), with a 47% drop in the success of conventional implantation regimen (ii) Four golden indicators for assessing tolerance Thickness: Ideal range 8-12mm (<7mm, the rate of implantation is close to zero)  Morphology: A-type trilinear sign > B-type weak trilinear > C-type homogeneous strong echogenicity  Blood flow: pulsatility index (PI) <2 (the pregnancy rate is zero when the PI is >3)  Frequency of movement: Positive peristaltic wave <3 per minute on the day of implantation II.The four “invisible killers” are destroying your…

    Breaking the invisible code of repeated IVF transfer failures

    Breaking the invisible code of repeated IVF transfer failures

    2025-06-12

    I. Microenvironment of the uterine cavity: the neglected “golden landing zone” of embryos The truth behind the grim statistics: Less than 20% of high-quality embryos settle in abnormal cavities, equivalent to the probability of conceiving naturally About 65% of Repeated Implantation Failure (RIF) patients have undiagnosed uterine cavity pathology25  The cost of blind implantation: each additional implantation cycle with unaddressed uterine cavity problems increases cumulative pregnancy rates by only 5-8% Dr. Emma Wilson, of the Cambridge Reproductive Center, puts it bluntly: “Neglecting to assess the uterine cavity is like sowing precious seeds onto concrete – even the best embryos will not be safe from the ‘invisible killers’!” II.The depth of the four major uterine cavity “invisible killers” decoding and cracking strategy Killer 1: endometrial blood flow “desertification” Mechanisms:  When the uterine artery pulsatility index (PI) is >2.5, the density of endometrial capillaries decreases by 40%.  Elevated resistance to blood flow deprives the embryo of oxygen, and the rate of implantation plummets by 42%. Precise Diagnosis:  4-D ultrasonography to quantify resistance to blood flow (target RI <0.80)  Laser Doppler to monitor the local partial pressure of oxygen (ideal value >50mmHg)  Innovative Therapy:  Sildenafil Therapy: 25mg oral three times daily, PI value within 2 weeks, PI value within 2 weeks. Three times daily, 25% reduction in PI within 2 weeks  Hyperbaric oxygen therapy: 10 sessions resulted in a 3-fold increase in thin endothelial angiogenesis Killer 2: “Ecological collapse” of the endothelial structure Hidden lesions:  38% of RIF patients have glandular interstitial disproportion missed by ultrasound5  Endothelial gland density <50/mm² decreases implantation rate by 38%  Golden Diagnosis:  Hysteroscopy: 98% sensitivity for detecting polyps, adhesions, 65% better than ultrasound Micro hysteroscopy: live-staining technique identifies glandular structural abnormalities  Regenerative Repair:  PRP uterine insufflations: platelet rich plasma Release of VEGF/FGF, endothelial thickening of 1.5-2mm, clinical pregnancy…

    Caloric Restriction Reverses Ovarian Aging

    Caloric Restriction Reverses Ovarian Aging｜New Evidence for Scientific Fertility Extension

    2025-06-11

    Heavyweight study in Cell, Nature reveals: 30% caloric restriction extends fertility window by 23 years, rejuvenates ovarian reserve by 70 I. The Brutal Truth About Ovarian Aging: Why Age 35 Becomes a Fertility Watershed The fertility curve recognized by reproductive scientists worldwide: 25-30 years old: natural pregnancy rate >75%, miscarriage rate <10%  35-40 years old: natural pregnancy rate plummets to 30%, miscarriage rate soars to 40%  ＞40 years old: aneuploidy rate of oocytes >80%, mitochondrial function decays by 60% Three major crises of biological nature: Follicle bank depletion: women are born with 1-2 million follicles; by age 35, only about 10% remain, and conversion of primordial follicles declines  Epigenetic disorders: ageing leads to aberrant DNA methylation in oocytes, triggering chromosome segregation errors  Inflammatory storms: localized CD38 protein buildup in the ovaries decreases NAD+ levels by 75%, accelerating the collapse of cellular energy  Dr. Emily Wilson, Director of Reproductive Endocrinology, Yale University Director Dr. Emily Wilson warns, “The 7% drop in live birth rate for every year a woman delays trying for a pregnancy after age 35 isn’t just a decay in numbers-it’s a precipitous slide in egg quality.” II.A disruptive discovery: how caloric restriction resets the ovarian biological clock The mouse model: the miracle of a 23-year extension of reproductive lifespan Experimental design: Adult mice (equivalent to human 25 years old) were subjected to 30% caloric restriction (CR) for 4 months (equivalent to human 22 years)  Shocking results:  Ovarian primordial follicular reserve increased by 100% in the CR group  Fertility window was extended to 23 months of age (human 68 years old), exceeding that of control by 50%  Survival rate of advanced litter size soared from 22% to 73% (P<0.001)  Mechanism deciphered: CR activated the CR activates the Sirt1 pathway in follicular granulosa cells, repairing meiotic errors and reducing aneuploidy…

    Guidelines for chromosome screening during pregnancy

    NT / Down screening / non-invasive / amniocentesis full analysis

    2025-06-01

    Stanford University 2025 study reveals: NIPT-plus diagnostic rate exceeded 99%, high-age surrogate mothers ushered in the screening revolution, this article focuses on NT, Down screening, non-invasive, amniocentesis full analysis I.The “four lines of defense” of chromosomal abnormality screening Golden window: 11-14 weeks of pregnancy (45-84mm diameter)Key indicators:Thickness of posterior nuchal translucency >3.0mm → risk of chromosomal abnormality ↑10 timesMissing nasal bone → risk of trisomy 21 up to 146.8Technical Breakthrough:Dr. Emily White’s team at London Fetal Medicine Center confirmed that NT blood flow spectroscopy has increased the detection rate to 91% (only 77% for traditional NT). Blind spot:Only covers trisomy 21/18/13 and neural tube defectsFalse positive rate >25% over 35 years of ageOptimization strategy:Combined NT + PAPP-A + β-hCG (Early Down) to achieve 90% detection rateSupplemental inhibin A test (mid) screens for 85% of neural tube defects Detection type detection rate Coverage of diseases population (esp. of a group of people) Basic NIPT 99% T21/T18/T13 Common Risk Surrogate Mothers NIPT-plus 95% +5 microdeletion syndromes Advanced age/bad pregnancy history Genome-wide NIPT 92% other chromosomal aneuploidies Fetal structural anomalies New York-Presbyterian Hospital case: 37-year-old surrogate mother Claire’s high risk (1:85) Down screening was confirmed low risk by NIPT-plus, avoiding unnecessary amniocentesis Technological innovation:Real-time ultrasound guidance reduces miscarriage rate to 0.1%Microarray chip (CMA) detects >100 microdeletion/duplication syndromesMust Scenario:NIPT high riskCouple balanced translocation carriersUltrasound suggestive of multiple malformations II.In-depth comparison of the four major technologies: from principle to choice Full analysis of performance parameters norm NT screening Serologic Down Screening NIPT haggis Detection rate (T21) 70-80% 60-70% ＞99% 99.9% false positive rate 5% 5-8% 0.1% 0.01% Inspection cycle 11-14weeks 15-20 weeks 12-22 weeks 16-24weeks riskiness non-invasive non-invasive non-invasive 0.1% risk of miscarriage III.Cracking clinical myths: 8 key questions and answers “Do I need an amniocentesis for a thickened NT but normal NIPT?”Must be done!…

    considerationsOptimization goalsClinical interventionsovarian reserveAMH≥1.2 ng/mlEgg freezing recommended for early onset ovarian insufficiencysperm qualityDNA fragmentation < 15%Smoking cessation + antioxidants (Vitamin C 500mg/day)BMI management18.5-24.9 kg/m²150 minutes of cardio per week + Mediterranean dietenvironmental exposurePM2.5＜35μg/m³Avoid extreme cold during transplantation cycle and activate air purifiersembryo selectionBlastocyst transfer is preferredCombined with AI morphodynamic assessment

    11 Key Factors for IVF Success

    2025-05-29

    The latest research in 2025 reveals that age only accounts for 30% of the weight of the key factors in IVF success rate, and laboratory technology and environmental factors are the key to breakthroughs I.Age and Ovarian Reserve: The Basis but Not the Only Determinant The critical effect of ageUnder 35: 60-75% success rate, <20% aneuploidy rate Above 40: live birth rate plummets to 10-20%, egg aneuploidy rate >80Disruptive finding: Spanish multicenter study confirms that even with young donor eggs, women ≥40 years of age have a 4.2% annual increase in the risk of implantation failure due to aging of the uterine microenvironment (RR=1.042)Quantitative indicators of ovarian reserveGolden combination of AMH and AFC:AMH <1.1 ng/ml requires immediate IVF initiation, AFC <6 suggests low reserve Women over 39 years of age with AMH >1.2 ng/ml can still achieve a live birth rate of 25-33%. II.Male factors and semen parameters: the underestimated contribution of the “other half”. Sperm quality thresholdsConventional IVF: sperm viability >40%, fertilization rate increased by 30% at concentrations >15×10⁶/mlIndications for ICSI: single sperm injection should be activated when sperm morphology is <4% normal or DNA fragmentation >25Hidden effects of age:Men >40 years old have a 2-fold increased risk of embryo termination when sperm DNA fragmentation rate breaks the warning line III.Laboratory technology: a revolution in embryo screening and environmental control AI-enabled embryo selectionMachine learning model analyzes 100+ features such as embryo morphology, division speed, etc., and achieves 92% accuracy rate of implantation prediction, which is 25% higher than the traditional morphological evaluationBlastocyst Cultivation Advantages and Risks BalanceBlastocyst transfer (Day5) has a 15% higher clinical pregnancy rate than cleavage-stage embryos (Day3), but a 40% elimination rateIndividualized strategy: Day3 transfer is recommended for those with <5 eggs to avoid unavailability of embryos New findings on environmental control Extreme cold + PM2.5:…

    the IVF PPOS Program

    The Definitive Guide to the IVF PPOS Program

    2025-05-28

    According to Dr. Emily Carter, Chief Specialist at the London Center for Reproductive Medicine, “The IVF PPOS protocol has redefined the boundaries of treatment for patients with diminished ovarian reserve, restoring hope to women who were once sentenced to the ‘death of fertility’.” The Global Challenge of Ovarian Hypoplasia Globally, 1 in 3 women over the age of 35 face the plight of diminished ovarian reserve (DOR). Harvard Medical School 2025 data shows: 28.7% of the population with AMH <1.1 ng/mLCycle cancellation rates as high as 41.2% for traditional ovulation regimensCumulative live birth rate is less than 30%As the fertility clock marches relentlessly forward, the IVF PPOS protocol (Progesterone Pretreatment Ovulation Suppression) is becoming a breakthrough option to rewrite the fertility outcomes of DOR patients. I. Molecular revolution of IVF PPOS program IVF PPOS achieves triple regulation through exogenous progesterone (medroxyprogesterone/digestrel): LH pulse frequency: 52% reduction (activation of potassium channels in GnRH neurons)FSH receptor expression: 3.2-fold enhancement of granulosa cell cAMP signalingFollicular fluid microenvironment: VEGF concentration increased by 45%, GDF-9 expression enhanced by 2.8 times Unlike traditional protocols, IVF PPOS opens up two initiation pathways: Follicular phase pathway: initiation on the 2nd-3rd day of menstruationLuteal phase pathway: 3-5 days after spontaneous ovulationThis flexibility allows DOR patients to increase their chances of ovulation by 1-2 times per year, significantly increasing the cumulative pregnancy rate. II. Precisely Matched 3D Applicable Populations 1.Genotype-oriented programs biomarker Expected benefits molecular mechanism FSHR c.2039A>G Number of eggs acquired ↑ 3.2 Enhanced affinity for FSH binding domain ESR1 PvuII mutation High-quality embryo rate ↑28% Estrogen response pathway optimization CYP19A1 overexpression Cyclical cancellation rate ↓76% Increased efficiency of androstenedione conversion Repeated cycle cancelation phenotype: 98.3% control rate in those with >2 uncontrolled LH peaksLow response combined with PCOS: Combined metformin reduced OHSS risk by 70%Elderly gene carriers: Blastocyst…

    Seven Differences Between IVF and Natural Pregnancy

    Seven Differences Between IVF and Natural Pregnancy

    2025-05-26

    In the field of reproductive medicine, the difference between ovulation induction and natural pregnancy is like the ecology of a natural forest versus an artificial nursery. According to the Harvard Center for Reproductive Medicine 2025 data, 40% of IVF cycles globally use traditional ovulation regimens, but the microenvironment of embryo development is biologically different from that of natural cycles. This article combines research from the New England Journal of Medicine, Human Reproduction, and other top journals to reveal seven major differences between IVF and natural pregnancy. I. The “Natural Maturation Law” of Egg Maturity Key Finding: Egg maturity is 89% in natural cycles, significantly higher than 82% in fertile cycles16Difference in fertilization rate: 70% in natural cycle vs 58% in fertile cycleEmbryo quality: 2x higher four-cell division rate and 47% lower cell fragmentation rate in natural cyclesBiological Metaphor:Natural eggs are like “ripe berries in the forest” with limited production but excellent quality; ovulation-promoted eggs are like “batch-ripened fruits in the greenhouse”, with a large increase in quantity but hidden maturation defects. Mechanistic Analysis:High doses of gonadotropins (e.g., FSH) may interfere with oocyte meiosis, resulting in abnormal distribution of cortical granules. The UCLA study found that the mitochondrial DNA copy number of eggs in pro-ovulatory cycles decreased by 35% compared to natural cycles, affecting embryonic energy metabolism. II.the “molecular storm” of the follicular fluid hormonal environment Breakthrough data: AMH concentration: 3 times higher in natural cycles than in ovulated cyclesEstradiol levels: 30 times higher in follicular fluid than in serum in natural cycles, only 8 times higher in pro-ovulatory cycles.LH peaks: natural cycles have 2.4 times the amplitude of LH pulses that trigger ovulation compared to pro-ovulatory cyclesClinical significance:Imbalances in the hormonal microenvironment may alter oocyte epigenetic programming. The Stanford team found that abnormally elevated androstenedione in follicular fluid during pro-ovulatory…

    Chromosomal Abnormalities in Female Eggs

    Scientific Analysis of Chromosomal Abnormalities in Female Eggs

    2025-05-23

    he chromosomal integrity of the egg, which is the starting point of life, is the “blueprint of life”. According to statistics, the rate of chromosomal abnormalities in embryos of women over 30 years of age is more than 40%, and the rate is as high as 75% in women over 40 years of age.28 This genetic imbalance has become one of the most difficult challenges in modern reproductive medicine. This article combines the latest research from the Harvard Center for Reproductive Medicine and The Lancet Special Issue on Reproductive Health to reveal the underlying mechanisms and breakthrough solutions for chromosomal abnormalities. I.Mechanism of chromosomal abnormality: a complex network beyond age The development of an egg from the primordial follicle to maturity requires two meiotic divisions, a process that is like a “tightrope walk” for DNA. Studies have shown that 85% of chromosomal errors occur in late meiosis, 3-4 months before ovulation, rather than the traditionally perceived long period of accumulation.1 Chromosome segregation at this time requires a large amount of ATP energy, and a decline in mitochondrial function will directly lead to chromosome non-segregation – the number of mitochondrial DNA copies in the oocyte of a woman at age 35 is down 60% compared to that of an egg at age 25.2 60% decline. Key Data: Meiosis I error rate: 27% (age 30) → 53% (age 40)Percentage of trisomic embryos: trisomy 21 (23%), trisomy 16 (18%), monosomy X (12%) Environmental endocrine disruptors such as bisphenol A (BPA) can silence key genes for reproduction such as HOXA10 through DNA methylation modifications. The UCLA study found that for every 1 ng/mL increase in urinary BPA concentration, there was a 12% increase in the risk of egg aneuploidy. Follicular fluid from patients with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) has a unique metabolic profile: 3-fold…

    navigation menu

    tatecare

    Kyrgyzstan Surrogacy Agency,Global IVF Hospitals,International Surrogate Mother Recruitment